Skip to main content

Full text of "Lincoln and liberty!!!"

See other formats


LINCOLN  AND  LIBERTY!! 


Tract  No.  13. 


New  York,  Sept.  11th,  1860. 


.fi 
« 

u 
a 

s, 

<& 

OS 

S 
»m 

s 

es 

S 

© 

fa 

•d 
a 


For  President, 

iAHAM   L1NC0 

©/"  Illinois. 

For  Vice-President, 


The  Annihilation  of  Douglas. 


Of  Jflaitte. 

State    Nominations. 

For  Governor,   EDWIN  D.  MORGAN. 

For  Lieutenant  Governor,  ROBERT   CAMPBELL. 

For  Canal  Commissioner,   S.  H.  BARNES. 

For  State  Prison  Inspector,   JAMES  K.  BATES. 

For  Electors  at  Large, 

WILLIAM  CULLEN  BRYANT, 
JAMES  0.  PUTNAM. 

For  District  Electors 


1.  John  A.  King. 

2.  Edward  W.  Fiske. 

3.  Andrew  Carignan, 

4.  James  Kelly. 

5.  Sigismund  Kaufman. 

6.  Frederick  Kapp. 

7.  Washington  Smith. 

8.  William  A.  Darling. 

9.  Wm.  H.  Robertson. 

10.  George  M.  Grier. 

11.  Rufus  H.  King. 

12.  Jacob  E.  Carpenter. 

13.  John  T.  Winslow 

14.  John  H.  Ten  Eyck. 

15.  N.  Edson  Sheldon. 

16.  Robert  S   Hale. 

17.  Abijah  Beckwith. 


18.  Henry  Churchill. 

19.  James  R.  Alliben. 

20.  B.  N.  Huntington. 

21.  S.  D.  Phelps. 

22.  G.  D.  Foote. 

23.  Hiram  Dewey. 

24.  Samuel  L.  Voorhis. 

25.  Wm.  Van  Martin. 

26.  John  E.  Seeley. 

27.  Frank  L.  Jones. 

28.  J.  S.  Wadsworth. 

29.  Ezra  M  Parsons. 

30.  Charles  C.  Parker. 

31.  E.  S.  Whalon. 

32.  John  Grennie,  Jr. 

33.  James  Parker. 


ISSUED  BY  THE 

§ oitng  gteit's  ^lepilitan   Union, 

OF  THE  CITY  OF  NEW  YORK. 

Campaign  Reading  Room,  Stuyvesant  Institute,  No.  659 

Broadway  ;  open  daily,  from  8  A.  M.  to  11  P.  M. 

"  Let  us  have  faith  that  right  makes  might, 
and  in  that  faith,  let  us  to  the  end,  dare  to  do 
our  duty,  as  we  understand  it. 

Abraham  Lincoln." 


BY  CHARLES  SUMNER. 

It  was  proposed  to  repeal  the  old  prohibition 
of  slavery  in  the  Missouri  territory,  established 
as  a  part  of  the  Missouri  compi-omise.  But, 
instead  of  doing  this  openly  and  precisely — say- 
ing in  so  many  words  that  this  provision  was 
repeated — language  was  devised  by  which  to 
mystify  the  whole  question.  Then  appeared  that 
"  stump  speech  in  the  belly  of  the  bill,"  accord- 
ing to  Col.  Benton,  declaring  that  the  intent  was 
to  leave  the  people  "  perfectly  free  to  form  and 
regulate  their  domestic  institutions  in  their  own 
way,  subject  only  to  the  constitution  of  the  United 
States."  As  the  fatal  bill  containing  these  words 
passed  in  the  gray  of  the  morning,  Gen.  Cass, 
rising  from  his  seat — I  remember  well  the  scene 
— exclaimed,  "  This  is  the  triumph  of  squatter 
sovereignty."  The  old  prohibition  of  slavery 
was  overthrown,  and  his  .Nicholson  letter  was 
vindicated. 

And  now  note  well  the  trick.  The  slave  mas- 
ters who  voted  for  these  words  rejected  with 
scorn  the  idea  that  the  handful  of  squatters  could 
exclude  slavery.  According  to  them,  slavery 
went  with  the  Constitution,  and  was  beyond 
the  control  of  the  squatters.  But  the  formal  asser- 
tion of  this  dogma  would  have  caused  trouble, 
and  it  was  accordingly  disguised  in  these  familiar 
words,  "  Subject  only  to  the  Constitution  of  the 
United  States."  Mr.  Benjamin  of  Louisiana,  in 
his  recent  speech,  let  us  behind  the  scenes.  He 
tells  us  that  at  a  caucus  of  Senators,  "  both  wings 
of  the  democracy  agreed  that  each  should  main- 
tain its  particular  theory  before  the  public — one 
side  sustaining  squatter  sovereignty  and  the 
other  protection  to  slavery  in  the  territories,  but 
pledging  themselves  to  abide  by  the  decision  of 
the  Supreme  court,  whatever  it  might  be."  Such 
was  the  secret  conspiracy — concealed  for  a  long 
time  from  the  public,  and  only  recently  revealed. 
And  Mr.  Dotiglas  was  a  party  to  it. 

Had  the  popular  sovereignty  of  Mr.  Douglas 
been  a  reality  and  not  a  sham ;  had  it  been  a 
sincere  recognition  of  popular  rights  instead  of  a 
trick  to  avoid  their  recognition,  he  could  not 
have  been  a  party  to  such  a  deception.  But 
this  is  not  all.  While  professing  popular  sover- 
eignty, what  does  his  bill  really  confer  upon  the 
people1?  Not  the  right  to  organize  their  own 
government,  determining  for  themselves  its  form 
and  character  ;  for  all  this  was  done  by  act  of 
congress.  Not  the  right  to  choose  the  executive  ; 
for  the  governor  and  all  other  officers  in  this  de- 
partment were  sent  from  Washington,  nom- 
inated by  the  President.  Not  the  right  to  nom- 
inate the  judiciary  ;for  the  judges  were  also  sent 
from  Washington,  nominated  by  the  President. 
Not  even  the  right  completely  to  constitute  the 
legislature ;  for  even  this  body  was  placed  in 
many  important  respects  beyond  the  popular  con- 
trol. Thus  in  each  of  the  three  great  depart- 
ments of  state — the  executive,  the  judicial  and 
the  legislative — was  popular  sovereignty  dis- 
owned 

Search  the  Congressional  Globe  for  the  month 
of  February,  1854,  and  you  will  see  with  what 
sincerity  Mr.  Douglas  guarded  the  much-vaunted 
rights  of  the  people.  Mr.  Chase  moved  to  allow 
the   people  to  elect  their  governor  and  other 


ft 

ft 
& 
9 

3 

9 

* 
S 

5* 

ft 

» 

fcrt 

& 
ft) 


Free    Speech.      Free   Press.      Free   Soil.      Free  fllen. 


LINCOLN  AND  HAMLIN— FACTS  FOE,  THE  PEOPLE. 


officers.  On  the  vote  by  ayes  and  noes  the  cham- 
pion of  popular  sovereignty  voted  No.  Mr.  Chase, 
whose  effort  to  unmask  this  hypocrisy  was  inde- 
fatigable, made  a  further  motion,  which  put  Mr. 
Douglas  still  more  to  the  test.  After  the  words 
of  alleged  popular  sovereignty  in  the  bill  he 
moved  to  add,  "  under  which  the  people  of  the 
territory  may,  through  their  representatives,  ex- 
clude slavery  if  they  choose."  Here  was  a  plain 
proposition.  On  the  vote  by  ayes  and  noes  Mr. 
Douglas  and  his  associates  again  voted  No. 

The  bill  was  passed  ;  and  then  came  other 
opportunities  to  test  the  sincerity  of  the  present 
inighterrant  of  popular  sovereignty.  Under  its 
provisions  commenced  at  once  a  race  of  emigra- 
tion into  the  new  territories,  and  the  free  labor 
and  slave  labor  grappled.  Lovers  of  freedom 
from  the  North  were  encountered  by  the  parti- 
zans  of  slavery  from  the  South,  organized  by  blue 
lodges  in  Missouri,  and  stimulated  from  every 
part  of  the  land  of  slavery.  The  officials  of  a 
government  established  under  pretended  safe- 
guards of  popular  sovereignty,  all  ranged  them- 
selves on  the  side  of  slavery,  or,  if  their  allegi- 
ance became  doubtful — as  in  the  case  of  Governor 
Reeder — they  were  dismissed,  and  more  avail- 
able tools  sent  instead.  I  spare  details.  You 
cannot  forget  that  winter  and  spring  preceding 
the  presidential  election  of  1856,  when  we  were 
alternately  startled  and  stunned  at  the  tidings 
from  Kansas  ;  when  a  body  of  strangers  from 
Missouri  entering  by  hundreds,  seized  by  force 
the  polls,  and  by  pretended  forms  of  law,  set  up 
a' usurpation,  which  proceeded  by  formal  legisla- 
tion to  establish  slavery  there,  and  to  surround 
it  by  a  code  of  death.  The  atrocity  of  Philip 
II.  when  by  violence  and  through  a  "  council  of 
blood"  he  sought  to  fasten  the  inquisition  upon 
Holland,  was  renewed.  Outrage,  arson,  rapine, 
rape,  invasion,  murder,  the  scaiping-knife,  were 
the  agents  now  employed  ;  and  to  crown  this 
prostration  of  popular  rights.  Lawrence,  home 
of  New  England  settlers  and  microcosm  of  New 
England  life,  was  burnt  to  the  ground  by  a  com- 
pany of  profane  and  drunken  ruffians,  stimulated 
from  Washington.  What  then  was  the  course  of 
the  champion  of  popular  sovereignty  ?  Did  he 
thunder  and  lighten  ?  Did  he  come  forward  to 
defend  those  settlers  who  had  gone  to  Kansas 
imder  the  pretended  safeguards  of  his  bill  ?  Oh, 
no  !  But  he  openly  ranged  himself  in  the  Sen- 
ate on  the  side  of  their  oppressors — mocked  at 
their  calumnies — denounced  them  as  "insur- 
gents"— insulted  their  agents,  and  told  them 
they  must  submit — while  the  distant  Emigrant 
Aid  Society  in  Massachusetts  was  made  the  butt 
of  his  most  opprobrious  assaults.  All  this  I  saw 
and  heard  myself. 

Then  came  another  scene,  with  which,  owing 
to  my  own  absence  from  the  Senate,  as  an 
invalid,  I  have  less  personal  familiarity  ;  but  it  is 
known  to  all  of  you.  The  senatorial  election  in 
Illinois  was  at  hand,  and  Mr.  Douglas  then 
suddenly  discovered  that  popular  sovereignty 
was  something  more  than  a  name.  He  opposed 
the  Lecompton  constitution;  but  my  distinguished 
colleague  will  tell  you  that  even  there  he  was 
kept  from  the  most  bare-faced  apostucy  only  by 
the  stern  will  and  indomitable  principle  of  the 
lamented  Broderick. 

If  you  follow  Mr.  Douglas  in  his  various 
speeches,  you  cannot  fail  to  be  shocked  by  the 
heartlessness  of  his  language.  Never  in  history 
has  any  public  man  insulted  human  nature  so 
boldly.  At  the  North  he  announces  himself  as 
"  always  for  the  white  man  against  the  nigger  ;  " 


but  at  the  South  he  is  "  for  the  nigger  against 
the  crocodile."  It  was  natural  that  such  a  man 
who  thus  mocked  at  a  portion  of  God's  creation, 
made  in  the  Divine  image,  should  say,  "  Vote 
slavery  up  or  vote  it  down."  He  knew  well  that 
under  his  device  the  settlers  could  only  vote  it 
up,  and  that  they  were  not  allowed  to  vote  it 
down.  But  this  speech  attests  his  brazen  in- 
sensibility to  human  rights.  Not  so  spoke  the 
fathers  of  the  Republic,  who  taught  us  all  never 
to  miss  an  opportunity  to  vote  slavery  down.  Not 
so  spoke  Washington,  who  declared  that  to  the 
abolition  of  slavery,  "  his  suffrage  should  never  be 
wanting"  And  such  is  the  whole  political 
philosophy  of  this  presidential  candidate,  except 
that  a  man  is  thus  indifferent  to  the  rights  of  a 
whole  race,  is  naturally  indifferent  to  other  things 
which  make  for  justice  and  peace. 

Again,  he  cries  out,  that  the  slavery  question 
is  the  way  of  public  business,  and  that  it  must 
be  removed  from  Congress.  But  who  has  thrust 
it  there  so  incessantly  as  himself?  Nay,  who 
so  largely  as  himself  has  been  the  occasion  of 
its  discussion  1  But  his  complaint  illustrates 
anew  the  old  fable.  It  was  the  wolf  above  that 
troubled  the  waters,  and  not  the  lamb  below. 


Slavery  has  no  Future. 

Bayard  Taylor  relates  the  following  incident 
in  one  of  his  recent  letters  on  home  travel : 

"At  White  River  Junction,  where  we  were 
obliged  to  wait  two  hours  for  the  train  from 
Boston  to  Montreal,  I  fell  in  with  an  intelligent 
Southern  gentleman,  whose  statements  with 
regard  to  the  gradual  deterioration  of  the  soil 
under  slave  labor  (of  which,  nevertheless,  he  was 
an  advocate!)  went  even  beyond  Helper's  ab- 
horred statistics.  He  candidly  admitted  that 
Slavery  can  only  exist  as  a  profitable  institution 
through  continual  expansion — when  the  soil  of 
one  State  is  exhausted,  it  must  move  to  a  new  one. 
"  But  how  long  can  this  process  be  carried 
on?"  I  asked  :  "  After  a  century  or  two,  when 
there  is  no  more  new  soil  left,  what  then?"  He 
shrugged  his  shoulders :  "  That,  at  least,  does 
not  concern  us."  I  think  no  intelligent  South- 
erner can  fail  to  take  the  same  view  of  the  final 
effect  of  Slave  Labor.  But,  considered  from 
their  own  stand-point,  what  a  suggestion  does 
it  present !  Slavery  has  no  future  !  Through 
its  own  operation  it  destroys  itself,  by  making 
itself  unprofitable,  and  the  question  which  must 
come  at  last :  "  What  is  to  be  done  with  it  ?■"  is 
carelessly  passed  on  to  succeeding  generations. 


What  an  Illinois  Bell-Man  Thinks  of  the 
Prospects  in  this  State. 

A  Bell-Everett  man  writing  in  a  business 
letter  from  Cairo,  in  this  State,  to  a  firm  in 
Rochester,  New  York,  says  of  politics  : 

Cairo,  Aug.  13,  1860. 

#  *  #  J  am,  as  before  on  the  National 
Union  platform,  and  we  intend  to  turn  the  elec- 
tion into  the  House,  when  John  Bell  or  Edward 
Everett  will  be  elected  President.  Lincoln  will 
carry  Illinois  by  about  15,000  majority.  _  Tt  is 
generally  conceded  here  that  Douglas  will  not 
carry  a  single  State  The  relative  strength  of 
parties  is  regarded  as  follows  :  1,  Lincoln  ;  2, 
Bell;  3,  Breckinridge;  and  Douglas  counted 
out  of  the  ring  entirely.  If  this  is  not  so, 
you  can  buy  the  best  hat  in  Rochester  at  my 
expense. 


LINCOLN  AND  HAMLIN— FACTS  FOR  THE  PEOPLE. 


From  Maine,  by  way  of  New  York. 

After  the  adjournment  of  the  New  York  Re- 
publican Convention  at  Syracuse  on  Wednesday, 
loud  calls  were  made  for  General  Nye  to  ad- 
dress those  present. 

General  Nye  was  hurried  on  to  the  platform, 
and,  in  a  brief  and  spirited  address,  congrat- 
ulated the  convention  on  the  result  of  its  de- 
liberations. He  had  recently  come  from  Maine, 
and  could  give  glad  tidings  from  that  State, 
which  would  give  20,000  majority  for  Wash- 
burne,  the  Republican  candidate  for  governor. 
He  remembered  a  whig  song,  which  used  to 
grate  harshly  on  his  ears  in  1840  : 

Oh,  have  you  heard 
Of  how  old  Maine  went,  went,  went  1 
It  went  hell  bent  for  Governor  Kent, 
And  Tippecanoe  and  T)ler  too. 

[Roars  of  laughter.] 

He  had  seen  the  Little  Giant  in  Maine,  and 
"heard  him  make  a  speech  on  squatter  sover- 
eignty. He  could  not  understand  it,  but  next 
day  he  had  been  to  a  livery  stable  and  heard 
two  Irishmen  discussing  the  speech  of  the  previ- 
ous night.  "  What  is  this  squatter  soverignty  ?" 
asked  one.  "  And  is  it  you  that  comes  from 
Ireland  and  asks  V  replied  the  other.  "  Why, 
I'll  tell  you  what  it  manes  ;  a  sovereign  must 
always  have  somebody  to  reign  over,  and  the 
squatter  sovereign  reigns  over  the  nagurs  ! — 
.fLaughter.] 


The  Bell-Ism — How  it  Works. 

The  Bell-Everett  Party  commenced  their 
•campaign  by  making  a  platform,  substantially  to 
the  effect  that  they  would  make  none.  They 
then  asked  their  candidate  to  write  a  letter, 
which  he  did,  and  in  it  declined  to  write  any. 

They  accordingly  declare  their  intention  to 
support  him,  and  to  prove  it,  are  going  to  vote 
Jbr  somebody  else.  Their  orators  here  declare 
that  Bell  is  the  only  Constitutional  candidate, 
and,  therefore,  recommend  everybody  to  support 
Douglas.  The  same  orators  then  go  down  to 
New  Jersey,  and  state  that  as  Bell  is  the  best 
•candidate,  it  is  everybody's  duty  to  vote  for 
Breckinridge. 

Carrying  out  the  campaign  in  the  same  spirit, 
they  confidently  predict  he  will  carry  the  States 
where  he  is  not  running,  and  denounce  as  trait- 
ors to  the  party  those  who  persist  in  keeping  up 
their  'party  organization.  And  when  Election 
Bay  comes  they  will  rejoice  over  the  A7otes  he 
don't  get,  and  mourn  over  those  he  does. 


Poor  Stephen. 

It  is  said  that  Bouglas  was  lately  overheard 
repeating  to  himself  the  following  quartrain  : 

"  When  I  think  of  what  I  am, 
And  what  I  used  to  was, 
Melhinks  I've  thrown  myself  away 
Without  sufficient  cause." 


Douglas  Record. 

Who  dodged  the  vote  on  the  Homestead  bill  ? 
Stephen  A.  Douglas.  Who  dodged  on  the  ad- 
mission of  Kansas  ?  Stephen  A.  Douglas.  Who 
claims  that  "  my  great  principle,"  Popular  Sov- 
ereignty, has  given  to  slavery  a  degree  and  a 
half  more  of  the  public  domain  than  the  slave 
power  claimed  ?  Stephen  A.  Douglas.  Isn't  he 
a  pretty  candidate  for  the  votes  of  free  laboring 
men. 


Mr.  Bell  as  a  Slaveholder. 

Mr.  Bell  (the  candidate  for  the  Presidency) 
has  a  third  interest  in  about  four  hundred  slaves, 
the  balance  belonging  to  his  second  wife. 
They  are  employed  in  Mr.  Bell's  iron  works 
on  the  Cumberland  river,  and  in  his  coal  banks 
in  Kentucky. — Herald  Correspondent. 

In  the  North  white  men  are  employed  as 
laborers  in  iron  works  and  coal  banks,  and  if  it 
was  not  for  the  institution  of  slavery  400  white 
men  would  find  employment  in  Mr.  Bell's  works 
instead  of  400  black  slaves. 


A  Dead  Cock  in  the  Pit. 

There  was  a  time  when  it  appeared  as  though 
Mr.  Douglas  might  receive  the  vote  of  one  or  two 
States  ;  but  that  time  has  happily  gone  by.  His 
unparalleled  ambition,  his  incessent  speech-ma- 
king, and  the  trading  propensities  of  his  unscru- 
pulous and  exasperated  followers,  have  deprived 
him  of  the  chance  of  carrying  a  single  State,  and 
are  hurrying  him  to  a  most  complete  and  humil- 
iating defeat.  He  will  soon  be  so  small  a  giant 
as  to  be  quite  invisible,  and  the  sooner  the 
better,  say  we. 

Should  any  of  his  deluded  admirers  think  him 
worthy  a  tomb-stone,  we  beg  to  suggest  the  fol- 
lowing, from  an  old  poet,  as  a  fitting  epitaph  : 

"  With  that  dull,  rooted,  callous  impudence, 
Which,  dead  to  shame,  and  every  nicer  sense, 
Ne'er  blushed  ;  truless,  in  spreading  vice's  snares, 
He  blunder'd  on  some  virtue,  unawares." 


Douglas  Literature. 

The    following    notice    was   actually  posted 
in  Marion,  Ohio  : 

"  Notos." — "a  grate  Duggleass  Meetin  is  to 
cum  off  on  Saterde  the  15teenth  and  a  poll  is  to 
be  razed  we  want  to  let  um  no  daoun  sowth  that 
maryann  kobnty  is  awl  rite  and  that  kant  go  nig- 
ger heer  we  are  skawtur  soverings  and  beleeve 
in  the  pepul  rooling  yew  will  pleese  publesh  this 
sum  blac  republekans  might  want  to  cum  as  are 
phitin  niggeri  now  Larew  Joolye  6teen  eighteen- 
6o." 


Growth  of  Republicanism. 

Not  the  least  gratifying  feature  of  the 
campaign  is  the  marked  and  steady  growth  of 
Republicanism  in  the  Slave  States.  Localities 
where  four  years  ago  freedom  of  speech  was  de- 
nied by  mob  force,  now  have  their  Republican 
meetings  and  Republican  newspapers.  Repub- 
lican Electoral  Tickets  are  running,  or  to  be  run, 
in  all  the  Northern  Slave  States,  and  the  vote  for 
them  will  show  a  steady  and  rapid  growth  of 
Republican  sentiment.  After  this  election  wiser 
counsels  will  doubtless  prevail  at  the  south  in 
regard  to  differences  of  political  opinion,  and  the 
organization  will  be  extended  to  every  State,  not 
only  with  respectable  strength,  but  with  pros- 
pects of  early  success. 

Great  Shake. 

A  Democratic  poetaster  sing  : — 

"  There's  a  waking  up  of  nations, 
A  stirring  up  of  snakes, 
The  people  shout  for  Douglas, 
Abe  Lincoln's  got  the  shakes  " 

Exactly — and  as  western  farmers  employ  victims 
of  the  ague  to  lean  against  the  trunks  of  their 
apple-trees  and  shake  off  the  Caterpillars,  so 
will  the  Republican  party  commission  "Abe  Lin- 
coln "  to  shake  every  worm  from  the  branches  of 
the  Tree  of  Liberty. 


MARK    THE    FIGURES. 

The  elaborate  statistical  table  herewith  printed,  is  eminently  worthy  the  careful  consid- 
eration of  men  of  all  parties  No  more  comprehensive  or  conclusive  exhibition  of  the  com- 
parative resources  and  prosperity  of  the  free  and  slave  states  could  possibly  be  given.  Let 
those  who  doubt  the  blighting  influences  of  the  "peculiar  institution,"  read  and  reflect  upon 
these  truthful  and  suggestive  figures. 


3 

En 

5* 

►3 

»  • 

p 

3 

o 

p- 

Q 

p 

©.- 

a 

O 

2. 

i 

0 

5' 

3 

B 

PI 

E 

S   c 

^1 

3 

\ 
5" 

3 

c" 

a 

p 

•1 
P 

i 

g 

5 

B 

p 
2 
p 

o 

p    * 

0 

3 

O 
3 

D 

C3 

S3 

0 

o 

O 

03 

1 

p 
B 

g 
s* 

g; 

p 

D 

1 

cr 
c 

■ 

5^     F 

-.   S" 

»     o 

•  r 

0 

- 
3 

p* 

0 

0 

-f' 

or 

83 

J8 

H 

CO 

MS* 

© 

OS 

§ 

Ms. 
Jl 

to 

Oi 
JO 

33 

- 

>. 

-1 

Jl 

X 

ji 

N      O 

© 

to 

3 

*.      CO 
Oi       © 

^3 

00 

J° 

OS 

CO       Oi 

-*3      J-       © 

J0       Ol 

JO       Oi 

(3. 

|5  ^ 

CO 

ot 

to 

"bi 

o 
4- 

OS 

— 
a 

GC 
Ol 

**. 

Jl 

33 

to 

o 

J> 
J" 

"bs 
o 

3> 

5 

3S 
X 

t-      "^3. 

o     to 
oo     to 

b: 

CO 
CO 

"co    To 
©     to 

©    to 

©         OS 
©         tf»> 

© 

c 
© 

to 

© 

"to 

CO 

© 

"to 

"bo    n    b     a    rfk    b 

O       ©       —       ©       ©       -3 
o       ©      rf*       ©      Oi       rf»- 

fTPp 

' 

^d 

CO 

to     ►— 

Oi 

Ms. 

to 

o 

GC 

» 

Jl 

to 

o 

to     -^ 

73 

to 

C: 

Cfi 

OS 

=: 

00 

O       -3 

© 

D 

cr 

rffc 

to 

to 

© 

Jl        M         IC 

£E 

to 

CO 

CO 

Q 

-J 

to 

33 

CO       — 

GO 

© 

© 

30      CO 

X       Oi 

•—    © 

© 

^J 

#> 

—       CS 

OS 

Oi 

© 

r: 

3 

~J 

£* 

Bk 

c  ?»■ 

to 

© 

EC 

o 

Sh 

O 

r^ 

O       00       rfi. 

CO 

■o 

Oi 

o 
3 

© 

"b» 

—     to 

3* 

_     Vi 

-•3 

i— 

M 

-J 

CO 

»" 

33 

* 

o 

•^t 

►fi. 

© 

£ 

£ 

S 

© 

4- 

rf>. 

33       *- 
O       MS. 

3 

^3       © 
3       tO 

o 

a 

■€* 

< 

to 

■e^ 

© 

CO 

to 

—3 

S. 

OS 

to 

CD 

3 

o 

O" 

3S 

33 
Ji 

P 

3j 

•<t 

NO 

J-4      ^D 

Oi 

_^ 

a 

cv 

w 

OS 

to 

i^     o     h     i-     or,     <o 
©      rf>      Oi      to      _      o 

o 

o 

4* 

O 

co 

o 

^ 

o 

as 

o 

3s 

D 

CO      ~0D 

"co 
© 

Oi 

GO 

0 
3 

00 

© 
© 

— 

cr 

Oi 

jo    "bs 

Ji      ' 

£. 

%0 

Si 

<p 

J"1 

JO 

0 

3) 

^        s, 

3 

&. 

i®      i3 

o» 

^ 

© 

© 

© 

r- 

- 

43. 

0 

?  «* 

JO 

GO 

to 

MS. 

os 

4- 
© 

o 

o 

0 

3D 

J3 

o 

D 

X 

"bi      "^3 

to     — 

rf*-       00 

© 
oo 

-3 

CO 

3-. 
■O 

OS         © 

©       -3 

O       Oi 

© 

C2 

o 

00 

^i 

to     ©     to 

-3; 

X      © 

.O      Ms. 
J»       --3 

3 

00 

to 

fcO    ^ 

i° 

^ 

o> 

O 

JO 

- 

JO 

JO 

CO 

t*. 

4s. 

r 

lis, 

3 

"to 

to 

Jo 

3s 

x 

p 

to 

OS 

r 
o 

X 

73 

to     to 

CO       Ol       OS 

rf»            H-            CO 

co    T-* 
o<      Oi 
w     to 

*© 

© 

00 

© 

0 

© 

rs 
ft 

*bi 

X 

- 

fe 

"to 
<x 

4^ 

"bs 

© 

=5       ^3 

5.       Ji. 

o     © 

X 

o 
to 

3 
J? 

^5 

to 

© 

-*3 

3 
4- 

~j 

o 
MS. 

Ji 

z> 

-*1 

1— 

-o 
o 

to 

0D       GO 

^0 

to 

_o 

"     ■■*- 

—      00 

w      — 

© 

-^ 

e 

- 

o     to 

ft 

CO       --3 

Jl         H- 

■g? 

o 

£ 

to 

4- 
OS 

00 

© 

CO 

Oi 

Ji 

<t 

33 

3 

*• 

CO 

CD 
Jl 

3D 

CO       QD 
CO       O 

GC 

> 

© 

© 

■f- 

© 

© 

31 

O 

a 

*© 

to 

© 

V. 

Oi 
Ol 

-J 

Oi 

x    bT     "Oi     M     "to 

->      Oi      ©      to      © 

Ji       ©       O       Oi       © 

S"  ° 

tO 
^3 

10 

"o 
00 

O 

31 

30 

tc 

o 
© 

O 

o 

Oi 
CD 
Oi 

OS 

-o 
a. 
o 

-J 

o 

to      te» 

i—     oo     to 

M          W          » 

0D       tO       OO 
Oi       CO       CO 

i :      —      c-. 

CO       Oi 

OS      o 
CO     to 

"bs 

© 

bs 

© 

©       ^3 

©       © 

GO       t-- 
©       — 

"CO      M 

qd     ta 
"to     © 

©    rf*. 

"bs 

Ol 

-3. 

to 

Ci 

to 

PS 

© 
"to 

4- 

© 

be 
© 
© 

©       CO 

o    •—     o> 

*3J      rfs»       J3.      " 

©       CO       CO 

Oi     ©     to 

4 

.O       CO 

—       Ms. 
3      © 

o 

o 
o 

3 

■w  iV 

g-c  O  D 

OCfBD 

o  rrr  re  C 
Jo       P 

-• 
33 

3 

O 

Ji 

Ji 

to 
r 

3D 
ft 

O     "^ 
Jl       to 

~ 

M 

P* 

GO 

^ 

tO 

Oi 

Ji 

o 

<3k 

o 

^* 

Jl 

>-    ^ 

< 

oo 

"to 

o 

Ifr 

CO 

CD 

u. 

o 

■°  si 

O' 

-J 

Oi 

O 

o 

— 

Jl 

OS      to      i 

Os      tO 

H 

& 

Ms. 

Oi 

-« 

s 

cr. 

*o 

00 

X       © 

r? 

CO 

iZI 

MS. 

J> 

MS. 

CO 

•s 

Jl 

--» 

> 

"•    J^* 

to     cs 

to 

00 

o< 

-»T 

Oi 

p  s 

CO 

O 

X 

o 

3 

■-» 

JZ 

— 

■&• 

Jl 

*-       CJ« 

to 

00 

Jj 

>— '     © 

"bi 

~J~ 

o 

"03. 

x    "bo 

o 

o 

-■ 

s. 

3 

—     ^     o 

CO 

S 

OS       Oi 

14 

3 

Oi 

—       GO 

5' 

* 

° 

*>■ 

CO 

GO 

P> 

3D 

CO      to      CO 

CO      »o 

GO 

H 

© 

Oi 

o 

©     © 

Oi 

CO 

OS 

*~ 

©      CO 

-*■      rfk      M>      © 

P 

£   P   P   «■  o 

© 

,_, 

> 

"oo 

it* 

^ 

w 

?  g.B  Ǥ" 

-J 

to 

3> 

O 

4* 

00 

^ 

»-•       CO 

rf*.       C3 

to 

GO 

0D 

©       © 

-1 

-*a: 

"cji 

3\ 

Ci 

to 

MS. 

Ji 

o 

Jt 

3 

"to 

o 

*-*       --3 

©    "to 

-0° 

"to 

©      *^ 

©    "bo 

■-3 

to 

GO 

"feo 

to 

p     ©    p     00     o     p 
"to    **~i    "-^i    "*<r    **■     o 

© 

© 

o 

J\ 

& 

CO 

a 

-o 

O 

3 

•—      CO      to 

Oi       CO 

© 

OJ 

CO 

to     as.     ©     Oi     »— *     ca 

Ms. 

c 

3 

& 

o 

o 

33 

Ji 

-0 

©    «-J 

■4-        Ol 

-^     © 

to 

*■ 

--3 

to 

*■ 

ji       -3       4>       i— ■ 

GO 

il^Sgi    I 

"|?l| 

u, 

^ 

© 

a 

© 

,_, 

to 

-* 

Ek 

M 

--? 

03 

4^ 

CO       © 

© 

4- 

1° 

*3. 

©       CO 

© 

43. 

© 

= 

lo 

lo 

"to 

-3 

o 

Oi 

3 

3- 

30 

o 

cs 

o 

X 

GO 

X 

© 

43> 

43. 

•Cfc 

d  o  O  B 

MS. 

o 

to 

o 

OS 

30 

-» 

3 

CO 

3 

Ji 

—       cji 

© 

© 

o 

CO 

3 

GO 

-^ 

© 

© 

gp<S 

© 

Oi 

o 

MS. 

OS 

-• 

Jl 

■s 

3 

o 

©    -* 

c?  !?  " 

^t 

•€» 

<© 

1_t 

to 

h- 

_     * 

^* 

to 

JO 

-0 

to 

o; 

i-  - 

J-*    . 

Ji 

i- 

^° 

^- 

© 

&<! 

«b 

MS. 

CO 

-J 

30 

^3 

0 

to 

j0 

•"-1 

o 

© 

-3 

to 

o 

00 

X 

43. 

-^ 

'bi 

■^ 

0 

Jl 

J« 

C    B> 

o 

o 

4- 

CO 

i- 

CC 

o 

J3 

tf> 

t 

© 

Jl 

Oi 

— 

CO 

© 

© 

© 

o 

33 

3  c 

GO 

33 

^ 

—■ 

O 

J3. 

33 

© 

CO 

3 

to 

03 

Ms> 

its. 

X 

0 

tr  re 

tO 

to 

CO 

4- 

33 

ft 

» 

© 

^ 

3 

OO 

IO 

GO 

O      "rfi. 

© 

o 

to 

*. 

-•■ 

-J 

-o 

O 

O 

3 

GO       *l> 

to 

© 

© 

Ji 

© 

© 

OO 

00 

=3 

0^ 

— ■ 

!■  ►* 

OS 

p 

*t* 

OS 

Oi 

Ji 

O 

33 

Jl 

CO 

to 

3 

© 

° 

Jl 

w 

O 

h- 

CO 

© 

c 

GO 

ji 

3 

B  a? 

R     -!    P 

M 

Ms. 

rfs. 

rO 

l-» 

OO 

Oi 

Ji 

© 

t-1 

to 

to    v-  .to 

to 

4s« 

"en 

o 
cs 

o 

3D 

CO 

To 

o 

5» 

Cj 

Jl 

"rf*. 

3D 

© 

~ 

— t 

© 

JO 

sr 

— 

to 

© 

St 

00 

a-. 

or- 
c 

or 

"© 

10 

to 

© 
© 

Ms. 

3S 
© 
© 

Jl 

Oi 

J 

JO 

to 

to 

OS 

4- 

~ 

X 

OD 

GO 

>>■ 

O 

3       tO 

-J 

oi 

MS. 

CO 

MS. 

-1 

F»- 

9 

OS 

33 

to 

00 

*■ 

CO 

3 

CJ. 

=: 

00 

M3. 

to 

© 

© 

X       -3 

to 

3 

s. 

1  f'" 

■€0 

^t 

OS 

to 

OS 

o 

to 

to 

** 

<€» 

CO 

Ji 

Js. 

o    to 

^ 

§   B 

tjs. 

4* 

j- 

C 

<( 

to 

» 

© 

© 

Oi 

OD       tO       ©       ■ 

Oi 

CD 

M* 

GO 

sj- 

3 

^  c 

"go 

GO 

o< 

lo 

Oi 

00 

Ji 

33 

"© 

to 

X 

30 

OO 

©       O       00 

Ji      o 

to   p 

35 

** 

~> 

; 

i- 

►t- 

OS 

o 

o 

© 

2 

» 

CO 

10 

° 

O 

o 

GO 

to 

to 

CO 

Oi 

O 

to 

© 

rf*- 

-3/ 

-4 

X 

© 

^ 

Oi 

© 

to      ©      CO      © 

3      CO 

a. 

Oi 

■^ 

•€& 

r4 

^ 

M 

© 

Ol 

to 

© 

X 

to 

Ms. 

to     to 

3 

•c 

MS- 

to 

^* 

OS 

to 

M3. 

- 

© 

Oi 

M> 

3       OD 

-3 

X 

3 

re  -0 

p 

w 

4-. 

© 

--* 

e 

o 

Oi 

3D 

10 

--3 

ZT. 

o 

© 

X 

■o 

-< 

O 

B  o 

c  w 

o 

o 

"OS 

33 

-4 

4- 

00 

© 

© 

O 

<0 

as 

5 

c: 

-i 

00 

w 

Xt 

■c 

a*- 

3 

S-'  p 

o 

o 

GD 

OS 

^\ 

© 

K^- 

to 

oo 

© 

© 

00 

00 

© 

13. 

3 

Ji 

e  — 

OS 

o 

rfs. 

o 

Cr 

(O 

If* 

3 

© 

OS 

00 

hfk 

■^ 

© 

© 

GO 

X 

Ji 

© 

o 

oi 

t^; 

M*. 

rfSt 

O 

'""' 

■^ 

CO 

CO 

~ 

o 

03 

to 

© 

p. 

CO 

Jl 

© 

rft 

CO 

to 

© 

"° 

"3 

-3 

Jl 

? 

^ 

& 

*© 

<a» 

tc 

o 

*© 

Oi 

to 

Jl 

Oi 

© 

—       i— ' 

O      Ms. 

o 

o 

CD 

00 

Oi 

OS 

to 

■1 

© 

3 

© 

p 

OS 

© 

j0       ©       *. 

8  ^ 

J30 

*-* 

o 

3S 

30 

to 

o 

00 

--3 

s 

X      ©      *>c 

»  S 

o 

o 

"*- 

en 

o 

T> 

JD 

bn 

'© 

-C 

OS 

to 

Ji       M> 

o 

-1 

to 

o 

CO 

K^- 

b 

o> 

00 

j0        CS 

-* 

Oi 

^ 

to 

s» 

to 

30 

-J 

>t± 

CO 

Oi 

X 

to 

x> 

4- 

© 

3 

33       Ol       © 

to 

-o; 

o 

li 

33 

£t 

4- 

0 

© 

o« 

oc 

to 

M3- 

MJSj 

to     © 

-3       © 

o 

Ol 

** 

(O 

to 

CO 

to 

00 

to 

03 

to 

CO 

*. 

©■ 

£» 

CO 

-i. 

* 

--1 

Oi 

° 

--       GC 

J«       --J 

Wide  Awakes 

Can  obtain  the  necessary  information  about  uniform,  &c,  by  applyiug  to  E.  A.  MANN, 

659  Broa^  vay. 


?I.2C&).085.00Z30